|
|
|
|
future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
Feb 24, 2008 10:58 PM
|
|
|
So what is the future of Timing Framework ,now that Chet(current owner) has left SUN to join adobe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
Feb 25, 2008 9:11 PM
in response to: trembovetski
|
|
|
Thanks for the link Dmitri, I have been reading chets posts quite frequently.
I was wondering abt what will happen to this nice project in future.
Will it Not be supported in future or maybe some one within SUN will own it and take it forward or will scenegraph replace the current timing framework completely.
Maybe urself or someone else within SUN are the best people to answer this question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
Mar 13, 2008 11:28 AM
in response to: trembovetski
|
|
|
and .... just to add to my previous question what abt the animated transitions framework also developed by Chet , I just hope someone at the SUN team is listening and keep this project alive since the concept is really very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
Mar 14, 2008 1:56 PM
in response to: psychostud
|
 |
Helpful |
|
|
Although the scenegraph library has a pure Java API, it is the engine driving the JavaFX Script UI library, and thus, an essential part of the JavaFX platform. It therefore has Sun's full support, and will only get better as it matures.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
Mar 26, 2008 3:40 AM
in response to: tball
|
|
|
Scenegraph looks promising but currently it is very low level and needs lots of boilerplate code to create simple transitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
May 11, 2008 1:50 AM
in response to: tball
|
|
|
Since this project no longer seems to be supported ,why dont they remove it from the list of projects on java.net after the consent of the owner(Chet).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: future of Timing Framwork
Posted:
May 12, 2008 2:31 PM
in response to: psychostud
|
|
|
Doesn't have to be this dramatic. The project has reached a stable release, after all. One might consider removing this forum itself, now that the project will not be (most probably) under active development.
|
|
|
|
|
java.net RSS
